John M McIntosh wrote: > Ok, well it seems to me having KOM and pharo working is *very* > important, actually > I'm relying on that for a meeting I'm having on friday. Obviously I'll > use a version of > Pharo from last month... > > Going forward you can burn all those bridges, but I'm not sure people > supporting that > other non-pharo stuff would care. > > Could you have a shim layer that is loaded to respect KOM's > expectations for behaviour? > Well or otherwise built a completely new MIME system for Pharo and let > KOM continue > with the obsolete one?
The changes are actually not many, but at a few critical points they matter and Kom is very aggressive in overriding stuff. That makes it hard coming up with an intermediate layer. But working on it :-) Michael _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
