Igor
your change is already in pharo :)
since months :)
Stef
On Mar 29, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:

> 2009/3/29 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>> did you check what the semaphore critical section is protecting?
>>        cr, tab, nextPutAll: and more and not protected.
>>
>> then transcriptStream inherits from stream which is not threadsafe,  
>> so
>> everything can happen.
>> I think that having a real thread safe output is a must.
>>
>
> as well as thread-safe updating.
> Btw, take a look at the http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7033
>
> The way how Transcript window updates itself is not safe. It should
> use deferUIMessage to update itself using regular world cycle.
>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Keith Hodges wrote:
>>
>>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I would really like that we get a threadSafeTranscript so I coded
>>>> one.
>>>> If you can comment this would help me.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>> What is the difference tot he exisitng one, it has an access
>>> semaphore too.
>>>
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to