Thanks! On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> Eliots code comes with additional tests. > > Furthermore I wrote an set of tests (see attachement). These tests > especially make sure that none of the optimizations destroy the > closure behavior. All existing Smalltalk implementations have some > bugs, even the commercial ones. > > Another test is that the image can be completely recompiled and no > additional test fails. > > Then the Seaside tests are another good candidate, they depend heavily > on block behavior. And continuations extensively stress the context > implementation. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > <ClosureTests.st>_______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
