It would be good to document this knowledge of what is expected in our
test suites. Especially if some are known to fail. Is there a pattern
already in use?
E.g. Method comment, pragma, wiki page entry? If not what should we adopt?

Thanks mike

On 4/1/09, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 01.04.2009, at 11:31, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 1, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>>
>>>> lukas is it normal that we get 3 tests yellow - did you get the same
>>>> in your image?
>>>
>>> #testToDoOutsideTemp and #testWhileModificationBefore are broken. I
>>> don't think that should stop us from integrating the closures into
>>> Pharo. Most "industrial strength" Smalltalk implementations have many
>>> more closure bugs than Pharo.
>>
>> This is integrated already and this is good to have such great test
>> suites.
>> I will integrate them this evening.
>>
>
> Lukas' teste should be already in, I think.
>
>       Marcus
>
>
> --
> Marcus Denker  --  [email protected]
> http://www.marcusdenker.de
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to