Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > Oops. I made a mistake in the experiment. There is actually less > difference than I thought. > > Here we load a web site, optionally using split and join to remove all > comments. My regex version seems to be only marginally worse than > Keith's sequence splitting. > > > 5289 "ON split on regex" > 5327 > > 5165 "KH split on sequence" > 5160 > > 2153 "no splitting" > 2160 > > So regex splitting seems to be feasible. > splitOn: uses double dispatch so that it is the argument that determines who it performs the splitting. All you have to do it implement Regex-#splitUp: aString
Keith _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
