With Keith's version you can do this: #(1 10 11 2 10 11 3 10 11 4) splitOn: #(10 11)
I was assuming that the thing we use to split was a regex string. 'hello there' split: '\s' Actually I see that Damien added this possibility in RubyShards as well. This also works: #(1 10 11 2 10 11 3 10 11 4) split: #(10 11) It seems that RubyShards is more general, but we need to take a closer look at both solutions. The interfaces are not the same. There may be differences in performance. - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 17:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > I would be in favor to have a nice oo solution :) > I do not know what means "uses a sequence to split a sequence." > > Stef > >> OK, I had a closer look. >> >> Keith's implementation is completely different from, and pre-dates, >> that of Damien and myself. >> >> Keith's version works for SequenceableCollections, and uses a >> sequence >> to split a sequence. >> >> Ours is more tailored towards Strings, and uses a regex to split a >> String. >> >> Perhaps we can consider a merge in which sequences can be split using >> sequences, and Strings can additionally be split using regexes. >> >> We should also take efficiency into account. I did not run any >> benchmarks yet to compare the implementations >> >> Who is interested in merging these two? >> >> Cheers, >> - on >> >> On Apr 5, 2009, at 16:25, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Now I see there are attached files in Mantis. But they all seem to >>> date from 2006, whereas your latest comments are from Jan 2009. >>> Are >>> there more recent files from 2009 that I should look at? If so, >>> where >>> are they? >>> >>> What is the best way to proceed? Shall I create a Join project on >>> SqueakSource, and if it is updated, post the latest version on >>> Mantis >>> too? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - on >>> >>> On Apr 5, 2009, at 16:08, Keith Hodges wrote: >>> >>>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>>>>> I wrote the split join implementation that is available on mantis >>>>>> >>>>>> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 >>>>>> >>>>>> I use it all the time, if you would like to improve on what is >>>>>> there, please continue to contribute to the mantis page >>>>>> discussion/ >>>>>> tests and code. That way we will get an polished implementation >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be added to squeak or to pharo. >>>>>> >>>>>> The suggestion to use #species would be fine (I never use species >>>>>> myself, because I dont understand what its really for). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> or class >>>>> the point is that you get back a collection of the same kind of >>>>> the >>>>> receiver >>>>> >>>>>> When stef says "I have checked the code and it looks nice" he >>>>>> didnt >>>>>> say which code he checked, so I am confused. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I looked at the latest version in the repository mentioned by >>>>> oscar >>>>> rubyshards >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Which appears to me to be the opposite of what Oscar suggested. >>>> If I >>>> read the email, he asked what the status of mantis 4874 was, >>>> anticipating that it be integrated. He had "gone back" to ruby >>>> shards in >>>> the absense of the integration of 4784. >>>> >>>> Keith >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
