Sounds reasonable. Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, or should it be on one of the wiki pages?
I searched, but found nothing. Is this the right page? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm - on On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not >> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.) >> >> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have >> been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to >> stick with the old MC? > > -support > -open and public repository aka SS2 > -understanding > -process > -tools > > at least for me. > So we will but not now our plate is quite full. > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
