On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable. > > Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, > or should it be on one of the wiki pages? > > I searched, but found nothing. > > Is this the right page? > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm > In milestone 3, there is an item called: "better source management ". I don't know If this is related to control version. > > - on > > On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > > >> > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not > >> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.) > >> > >> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have > >> been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to > >> stick with the old MC? > > > > -support > > -open and public repository aka SS2 > > -understanding > > -process > > -tools > > > > at least for me. > > So we will but not now our plate is quite full. > > > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
