for sure don't get me wrong ;-) i'm all for change and we're making great progress. it was just in comment to alpha->beta style discussion. I'm looking forward to us discussing release candidates. that will be cool indeed.
mike On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. > But we took the decision to harvest the fix of events because they > could rot > dramatically. > Then removing bad code is also important for the relicensing. > The less etoy bookmoprh the less relicensing we have. > >> I have been running the sunits recently for each update or published >> build. It would be great if more people could do this so that we can >> seriously get the error list down. Also we should try not to push out >> updates if they increase the error number. To make comparison easier I >> was going to publish the baseline results on the wiki to make it easy >> to see progress. I got stuck when recently the tests did not complete >> :-) but I think this is a good example of why we should focus in this >> area. >> Thanks mike > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
