sure no problem I was just explaining :) On Apr 23, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote:
> for sure don't get me wrong ;-) i'm all for change and we're making > great progress. it was just in comment to alpha->beta style > discussion. I'm looking forward to us discussing release candidates. > that will be cool indeed. > > mike > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree. >> But we took the decision to harvest the fix of events because they >> could rot >> dramatically. >> Then removing bad code is also important for the relicensing. >> The less etoy bookmoprh the less relicensing we have. >> >>> I have been running the sunits recently for each update or published >>> build. It would be great if more people could do this so that we can >>> seriously get the error list down. Also we should try not to push >>> out >>> updates if they increase the error number. To make comparison >>> easier I >>> was going to publish the baseline results on the wiki to make it >>> easy >>> to see progress. I got stuck when recently the tests did not >>> complete >>> :-) but I think this is a good example of why we should focus in >>> this >>> area. >>> Thanks mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
