Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > still > Don't you think that having a default can can be regenerated is not > better and simple?
Not sure what you are saying here. I'm proposing having "something" so we can regenerate the default setup. Alain proposed to be able to regenerate the current settings, which I don't think is what we want, especially as that would mean dirty packages every time you change a setting. Michael >> But your proposal have me a different idea how to solve the problem >> for preference values: >> >> For references to objects or classes in the value entry it would help >> to have the class reference search also go through the preference >> values. That way you would get informed of references to a class from >> preferences before removing the class. >> There are probably other well known locations that should be checked >> (e.g. Object Dependents). >> >> Michael >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
