On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Michael Rueger wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> still >> Don't you think that having a default can can be regenerated is not >> better and simple? > > > Not sure what you are saying here. I'm proposing having "something" so > we can regenerate the default setup.
OK > > Alain proposed to be able to regenerate the current settings, which I > don't think is what we want, especially as that would mean dirty > packages every time you change a setting. OK I understand and I agree with you. > > > Michael > >>> But your proposal have me a different idea how to solve the problem >>> for preference values: >>> >>> For references to objects or classes in the value entry it would >>> help >>> to have the class reference search also go through the preference >>> values. That way you would get informed of references to a class >>> from >>> preferences before removing the class. >>> There are probably other well known locations that should be checked >>> (e.g. Object Dependents). >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
