I kind of agree with Steve, however, it is hard to see how this will  
increase the quality of source code.

Alexandre


On 14 May 2009, at 19:10, Cameron Sanders wrote:

>
> That is not always the best policy. If you provide public accessors
> for your private model elements (representation), the next thing you
> know people start using them! And then your model interfaces is
> constrained.
>
> ? or am i just talking trash ?
>
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Steve Wirts wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Would it be inappropriate to request that an effort be made at some
>> point to try to provide accessors for all instance/class instance
>> variables, and try to  get rid of inappropriate direct variable
>> accessing where possible?
>>
>> The "chasing variables" function is handy but seems more cumbersome
>> than just putting a halt in a setter.
>>
>> I know this would be a lot of work but maybe it could be automated.
>>
>> Just tell me to shut up and go away if I'm being a nuisance.
>
> Oh, and please stick around... to draw attention away from my pesky
> questions.
>
>>
>>
>> Steve :)
>
>
> -cam
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.






_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to