you can always do an abstract iv refactoring when you want to debug to  
funnel an halt.
I should say that I'm not a big fan of accessor in a language that  
does not have protected like
semantics.

Stef


On May 14, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:

>
> On 14.05.2009, at 12:55, Steve Wirts wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> Would it be inappropriate to request that an effort be made at some
>> point to try to provide accessors for all instance/class instance
>> variables, and try to  get rid of inappropriate direct variable
>> accessing where possible?
>>
>> The "chasing variables" function is handy but seems more cumbersome
>> than just putting a halt in a setter.
>>
>> I know this would be a lot of work but maybe it could be automated.
>>
>> Just tell me to shut up and go away if I'm being a nuisance.
>
>
> In general I am a fan of self-style way of not destinguishing between
> sends and instvar access.
> (like NewSpeak, Gilad has some nice blog-posts on why you want message
> sends for everything).
>
> But one thing can be quite problematic: performance. In Morphic, some
> years ago somebody did this
> refactoring. *all* accesses where replaced by messages sends. The
> problem: performance. Especially
> the path when accessing morphic properties added *lots* of message
> sends, even for the case when
> it was supposed to fail fast (e.g. morph-extension nil).
>
> Just removing those got us a lot of performance back when comparing
> 3.9 with 3.8 (these changes where
> later added to the OLPC image, too).
>
> Of course, this can be optimized easily in a JITed environment, but
> just doing it for everything in Pharo
> now would not be wise. In addition, one would need to think about
> syntax.... implicit self, yes or no?
>
> The question about debugging of course can be solved, too, by making
> variables real objects that one can,
> for example, put a break-point on...
>
>       Marcus
>
> --
> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de
> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to