On May 28, 2009, at 21:41 , John McIntosh wrote: > Well I think a statement of direction is required. Is *all* ANSI > specific > logic going to be in the base Pharo? Is base Pharo going to be > ANSI compliant ? > I don't think people want to load chunks of it from here and there, > assuming > they know they need to do that.
I see it like this: - keep already existing ANSI compliant behavior - where appropriate, fix semantics to be compliant - where appropriate, add new ANSI behavior Full compliance, on the other hand, is not a primary goal. Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
