On May 28, 2009, at 23:06 , Lukas Renggli wrote: >> so the comprise for now would be to at least not actively remove >> methods/classes that are part of the ANSI standard?
Yes. > Yes, this is exactly what I was asking for. I did not suggest to add > new features. Squeak 3.9 already has a pretty good ANSI compliance. This is exactly what I said one hour ago: "- keep already existing ANSI compliant behavior" I don't understand why you reply with "If you undermine the Smalltalk standard" etc. So, it seems, we agree. Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
