Hi!
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Göran,
>
> Pharo is not even at beta, and has some speed and (Stef's reaction) stability
> problems. Having read Stef's recent reply to me, I'm wondering whether some
> of the performance/response time problems are related to input starvation, or
> a false assumption of same.
>
> My vote would be to let Pharo mature under its current leadership and then
> worry about whether to merge the two projects.
>
> Bill
Sure, that is an aspect of it all of course. On the other hand - new
fresh work is always done at the "frontier" so for me as a developer
wondering where my time is best spent it is still a valid question I
need to ask myself:
Where do I put my effort? In latest Squeak.org or latest Pharo?
I agree that as a *user* I might still deploy/develop in a good old and
tried image - say 3.10.2 or whatever.
Tonight I just spent time trying/testing my Blackfoot package in the
Seaside Pharo image. (Works fine btw!) This is time I am spending in
order to make my work (in this case Blackfoot) available to Pharo
people. And thus the question about where these two projects are going
is highly relevant to me.
regards, Göran
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
