It's possible that the baseline mechanism isn't accurate. I'll check that. Someone could also verify the baselines. That would help.
Cheers, Mike On Sunday, July 5, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote: > Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following > results: > 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors > > Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: > 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors > > > > I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/BaselineTestResults > > ___________________ > http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
