yes i will do. just a bit busy ;-) but it's great to see a bunch of new tests in the image. I will post my scripts onto the wiki and perhaps someone can review for inclusion in the image - needs a bit of work. i would like a single click that writes out the test run in google wiki format then anyone can upload baseline results. we could then host this on a server somewhere etc....
cheers mike On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Stéphane Ducasse<[email protected]> wrote: > Yes mike so if you can check that it would just great. > > On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Michael Roberts wrote: > >> Sure it's a good thing. We should make sure our test output is telling >> the truth.,... >> Mike >> On Monday, July 6, 2009, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Running the tests in the latest core (10371), I get the following >>>> results: >>>> 5154 run, 5133 passes, 2 expected failures, 17 failures, 2 errors >>>> >>>> Comparing to the last result in 10292cl [1]: >>>> 3029 run, 2956 passes, 2 expected failures, 24 failures, 47 errors >>>> >>>> >>>> I wonder how it is possible to get from 3029 to 5154 tests? >>> >>> More tests, less problems, why do you care? :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
