El lun, 03-08-2009 a las 20:45 +0200, Lukas Renggli escribió: > > sometime ago I asked which of the RFB/RemoteFrameBuffer versions should > > be the one to go for. I choose yours > > (http://source.lukar-renggli.ch/unsorted) because the one on squeak > > source hasn't had commits (maybe because they were not necessary) but > > more importantly, yours has been tailored to Pharo. > > Yes, the one in my repository works with the new event system in > Pharo. It does not work in any other image though. > > > I want to make some modifications to the code to better support > > configuration of preferences by scripts and not by GUI prompts (I am > > working my script to install and configure all I want in a pharo core > > image, something like Damien's work, but only with my code and its > > dependencies). For this, I want to share the code. Should I upload to > > your repo? It is open to upload (I'm almost sure it is)? > > Sure, feel free to commit the code to my repository. > > Actually I already patched out most of the annoying GUI prompts > myself. I use the code in many headless production images for years > already and start/stop the server with "RBFServer start: 2" / > "RBFServer stop".
Yes, but I want to add accessor to set/get the different preferences by code and not by the menu. This is what I want to add, so we can completly configure a RFB server with a script in a workspace or as a initial script, for booting core-images for production use (the aim of core-images as I remember). > > > Wouldn't be better to copy the RFB code from your repo to the > > Pharo/PharoInbox repo given that it will be used heavily with > > pharo-web/pharo-dev and more related to pharo than to lukas (I don't > > have anything against your repo, in fact it is full of good code, but I > > think that the more projects for pharo are stored in the same place, the > > better for the final user. Also, I foresee this version as the official > > one for pharo, not a version with addons/modifications/hacks for lukas' > > servers. > > Feel free to post it to a new repository if you want. I did not commit > my changes to the official repository because the repository is > read-only and because I changed many things that might not be to the > linkings of a wider audience. > > > to set the class variables and it doesn't permit other behavior. > > Shouldn't this be a preference method and when called, assing the > > apropriate variables values? > > I don't remember. Presumably I changed that because it was the only > reasonable setting. > > > I can't find users of initialize on RFBServer class side. Where it is > > called? On loading by Monticello? > > Yes, class-side initializers are called when the code is loaded. > > > What is the difference between names initialise (on instance side) and > > initialize (on class side). Is a typo? > > #initialize on instance-side is called when the object is instantiated > with #new. Yes, but I mean the name, not the function. Instance side use initiali"s"e and the class side use initiali"z"e, maybe it is just a typo. > > > I want to make and upload a new version with some modifications. After > > review, do you agree to copy them to PharoInbox or do you prefer to have > > it in your repo? > > I don't think this should go to the PharoInbox, this is not a > core-image package. > > Lukas > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
