It could be good to see what extra features we want or not in SUnit because this is also sad that we limit ourselves like that (even if I value cross platofrm portability).
Stef On Aug 18, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Ramon Leon wrote: >> Yes, I had the same problem. I asked him and he was actually talking >> about "sUnit Improved". >> >> I don't know what I should do at this point beyond just fixing the >> tests to run without this method. What are the plans for the sUnit >> that is in Pharo right now? Would it be helpful to add that method? I >> guess what I'm asking is there something I can do to be helpful in >> this regard? >> >> Thanks! > > I'll update Sandstone's tests to not use sUnit enhanced in the next > day > or two after I look at the change set you sent me so this isn't an > issue. This isn't the first time it's come up. > > Ramon Leon > http://onsmalltalk.com > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
