On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Miguel Cobá wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stéphane
> Ducasse<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> About http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/PackagesTestedInPharo
>> I was wondering if it would not be better to use the Universe
>> mechanism.
>> We could create a Pharo Universe and people could describe that their
>> packages load in Pharo1.0
>> This would be great and important to get a update to date catalog of
>> what is working in Pharo1.0.
>> What do you think?
>
>
> I think that this will be discussed by the community at a large. What
> will be the way to
> install packages on Pharo.
so far
we only want MC packages :)
> SqueakMap (PharoMap)
> SqueakSouce (PharoSource)
> Monticello repos on other site
> Update stream (this will be for the core anyway)
> MC1.5, MC1.6, MC2
> DeltaStreams
> SARs
>
> A lot of options but we must not replicate the nightmare that squeak
> has.
>
> I personally vote for Monticello and Monticello configuration for a
> _well know official repo_.
>
> This repo will have just the official versions that work/worked with
> pharo in a given time.
> The other versions should be stored on personal separated repos, like
> lukas repo or squeak repo.
could be a solution
Pharo10 with all the packages working.
> But let discuss this.
the problem is that for packages evolving you would have a lot of
traffic
> Also, I have something against universes, as they force to use just
> the universe versions of a package and don't play
> well with separated packages installed from monticello or other (but
> maybe it is just me that haven't learned to use it
> well, so if this is so, discard this last part)
I do not know. I wanted to avoid squeakmap attitude where you could
not know if a package would load
or not.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
