Em 20/08/2009 14:02, Miguel Cobá < [email protected] > escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stéphane
Ducasse wrote:
> Hi all
>
> About http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/PackagesTestedInPharo
> I was wondering if it would not be better to use the Universe mechanism.
> We could create a Pharo Universe and people could describe that their
> packages load in Pharo1.0
> This would be great and important to get a update to date catalog of
> what is working in Pharo1.0.
> What do you think?
Em 20/08/2009 14:02, Miguel Cobá < [email protected] > escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > About http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/PackagesTestedInPharo I
> > was wondering if it would not be better to use the Universe
> > mechanism.
We could create a Pharo Universe and people could
> > describe that their packages load in Pharo1.0 This would be great
> > and important to get a update to date catalog of what is working in
> > Pharo1.0. What do you think?
>
>
> I think that this will be discussed by the community at a large. What
> will be the way to install packages on Pharo.
>
> SqueakMap (PharoMap)
> SqueakSouce (PharoSource)
> Monticello repos on other site
> Update stream (this will be for the core anyway)
> MC1.5, MC1.6, MC2
> DeltaStreams
> SARs
>
> A lot of options but we must not replicate the nightmare that squeak
> has.
>
Yes! We have to make it simple in order to have all
documentation, examples, coordination on packages, etc. always
aligned.
> I personally vote for Monticello and Mont
icello configuration for a
> _well know official repo_.
>
Will the forthcoming version of Monticello be able to deal with
changesets and deal automatically with dependencies (like
Universe)?
> This repo will have just the official versions that work/worked with
> pharo in a given time. The other versions should be stored on
> personal separated repos, like lukas repo or squeak repo.
>
> But let discuss this.
>
I agree. If we don't arrive quickly at a 'winner', we can put a
wiki page where each solution and its strengths (understood here
as features) can be tabulated and then we can find what are the
must have, good to have, etc. to choose one (or chose one as
baseline and augment it [for example I remember one of Squeak
versions had a package to connect to SVN servers]).
> Also, I have something against universes, as they force to
use just
> the universe versions of a package and don't play well with separated
> packages installed from monticello or other (but maybe it is just me
> that haven't learned to use it well, so if this is so, discard this
> last part)
>
Well, once one solution (for packaging) be decided to use
officially in Pharo, this tends to have less importance.
My 0.019999. . .
--
Cesar Rabak
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
