2009/10/13 Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>

>  Hello all,
>
> I had no idea I left such an inaccurate impression, but on re-reading what
> I wrote, it could be taken as though I sought to compete with Diego - sorry
> about that all around.
>

No no. I didn get that impressiont. I just asked because I wanted to know
the differences :)
Don't worry.


> Let's try this again:
>
> I found Diego's work lacking the ability to query table names and field
> names/types, wrote code to those things, and plan to make it available.
> Think of it as being an addition to Diego's package; the two can be merged.
>



> One thing I do not like about Squeak/Pharo in general is the whacked up way
> it mixes
>
snapshots with startup and shutdown.
>

I don't understand this.


> If I were to spin off of a new ODBC package, it would be to fix that.
>
> The porting to which I referred is code that runs on top of OBBC, sockets,
> etc.  That goes fairly well, and will spin off some collective benefits with
> time.  As I said some time back, the best thing I can do to help with Pharo
> is to get myself hooked on it, at which point I will begin writing tools
> that would be of general interest.
>
> It would help a lot to have a good way to export syntax colored code
> (HTML??) from MC packages.
>

I don't understand whot this is related with ODBC :(


> My concern is that I might have comments that need to be removed for
> release.  I live under a few non-disclosure agreements, and it would be bad
> to have a stray comment violate one of them.  I am pretty careful about that
> now, but every so often find something that would have been more wisely
> placed outside of my code.
>
> The worst news I have is that when I tried to move code into the October
> web image, the image refused to open an ODBC connection.  In fact, the vm
> just crashed w/o writing diagnostic info to a file.  I retreated to my
> current (July) image, and have been distracted with lots of progress on some
> complex fronts; however, I do need to get back to trying to identify the
> source of the crash.
>
>

yeah, I remember :(


> Bill
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mariano
> Martinez Peck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:02 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] ODBC
>
> I would also like to know the difference (advantages and disadvatages) of
> Bill's driver and the one of Diego Gomez Deck which is:
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2480
> http://www.squeaksource.com/ODBC.html
>
> Best,
>
> Mariano
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Carlos Crosetti <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> How is the ODBC port to Pharo going on?
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]en nombre de
>> Schwab,Wilhelm K
>> Enviado el: Martes, 01 de Septiembre de 2009 05:15 p.m.
>> Para: [email protected]
>> Asunto: [Pharo-project] ODBCWarning
>>
>>
>> The porting continues...  It is getting closer to doing something.  It
>> just
>> raised an ODBCWarning about the server changing the language to
>> us_english.
>> Any ideas?  Either I do not care or should set it up front??
>>
>> One thing really surprised me, and note that I might have brought this on
>> myself (though I think that is unlikely) by messing with startup and
>> shutdown: the ODBCLibrary was stubbornly clinging to the Linux library
>> from
>> my home machine.  I finally used
>>
>>    ODBCLibrary default initialize.
>>
>> which seemed to put an end to the separation anxiety.  Is there a better
>> fix?  I suppose I should try this in a clean image to see if there is
>> really
>> a problem therein, but that will be a little hard to do without a lot of
>> my
>> code, almost any of which either depends on changes I have made or could
>> have caused the problem.
>>
>> Maybe I should ask whether some of you use ODBC on Windows and Linux and
>> have no problems moving between the machines.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.560 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1323 - Release Date:
>> 10/03/2008
>> 11:07 a.m.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to