> > Hi guys > > It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we > should integrate. > Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to > know for example > when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is ready > to go in 1.1. > > In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is > available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed). > It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be > integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after > we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not > tagged 1.0 and may be we should script > the bugtracker.
I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's FasterSets code to Phare 1.1. If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and any hashedCollections code at the same time. I thus suggest that a final decision on FasterSets be made and get the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done on top of FasterSets rather than in parallel. Regards, Ralph Boland -- Volume * Density = Mass. Volume / Density = Intelligence. The latter equation explains the essentially equal intelligence of men and woman and the capabilities of some commonly used operating systems. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
