Ok I will let martin and andres have a look because I'm not enough expert in that.
On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Ralph Boland wrote: >> >> Hi guys >> >> It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we >> should integrate. >> Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to >> know for example >> when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is >> ready >> to go in 1.1. >> >> In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is >> available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed). >> It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be >> integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after >> we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not >> tagged 1.0 and may be we should script >> the bugtracker. > > I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's > FasterSets code to Phare 1.1. > If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and > any hashedCollections code at the same time. > I thus suggest that a final decision on FasterSets be made and get > the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done > on top of FasterSets rather than in parallel. > > Regards, > > Ralph Boland > > -- > Volume * Density = Mass. > Volume / Density = Intelligence. > The latter equation explains the > essentially equal intelligence of men and woman > and the capabilities of some commonly used operating systems. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
