On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote:

> In my experience the truetype fonts and the mac skin are a major
> slowdown. If I disable both things I get a much faster image. Now I do
> like nice fonts, so I just live with that speed penalty ...
> 

maybe we should add a note to the download page that on slow machines, people
should download the Core image instead and switch the skin to a simpler one...

        Marcus


> Lukas
> 
> On Thursday, November 26, 2009, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Stef,
>> 
>> I have a "slow" machine that stands ready to help with numbers any time; it 
>> is semi-retired now, running Ubuntu 9.04.  It might be a good ideas to 
>> dual-boot it, but I find it challenging to work up the motivation to assault 
>> it with a Windows CD, and I have a similar era machine running win2k.
>> 
>> My sense is that Pharo is slower than Squeak, and I am suspicious that the 
>> Linux vm is not as efficient as it could be.  I forget wheher I saw this 
>> only on Linux, but somewhere I reported a long-sourced method that I saw 
>> draw in monochrome and AGAIN in color.  Nothing against Shout (as the 
>> self-apppointed comment pedant, I **really** appreciate syntax 
>> highlighting), there might be some room for efficiency by skipping the 
>> monochrom pass.
>> 
>> Resizing on Linux turns the main window black.  It might make more sense to 
>> invalidate and draw once after the sizing is complete??
>> 
>> I have long heard people claim that Linux is faster than Windows, but I was 
>> not convinced.  Having recently purchased a new machine and watched it labor 
>> under the weight of Vista long enough to see for myself what all the stench 
>> was about, I think I get it.  Current Linux distributions with the customary 
>> graphical largese are not happy on 7+ year old machines that handily run 
>> Win2k.  However, a new box that just barely gets by under Windows will be 
>> relatively quick running Linux.
>> 
>> I forget who said it: "software is getting slow faster than hardware is 
>> getting fast."
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane 
>> Ducasse
>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:02 PM
>> To: neil butterworth
>> Cc: Pharo Development
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] about Pharo
>> 
>> Thanks for your reply :)
>> 
>>>> what you report is strange.
>>>> Can you let us know:
>>> 
>>>>        - vm
>>> 
>>> The Pharo VM is the current (as of a couple of days ago) download from
>>> the Pharo Homepage - Squeak 3.11.4 (beta).
>>> 
>>>>        - OS
>>> 
>>> Win2K SP4
>>> 
>>>>        - image version
>>> 
>>> Once again, a very recent download -
>>> pharo1.0-10493-rc1dev09.11.2.image
>>> 
>>>>        - your display depth
>>> 
>>> True Color 24 bit
>> 
>> I have
>>        Display depth -> 32
>> 
>> then 24 looks strange to me.
>> 
>> depth: bitsPerPixel
>>        (bitsPerPixel > 32 or:
>>                [(bitsPerPixel bitAnd: bitsPerPixel-1) ~= 0])
>>                ifTrue: [self halt: 'bitsPerPixel must be 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 
>> 32'].
>>        depth := bitsPerPixel
>> 
>> Can you type
>>        Display depth
>> 
>>        and Display depth: 32 to see if this change something?
>> 
>>>> Because people are using pharo on production and we got an increase
>>>> of 15% of Morphic in pharo 1.1 so I have some doubts.
>>> 
>>> It is very definitely much slower than Squeak on my system. This is an
>>> old laptop 900MHz P3, but it has no problems at all running Squeak.
>> 
>> We should keep an old machine around to test it.
>> this is strange.
>> Because the Ob2Browser is slow because it displays package and getting 
>> package information is slow.
>> Which browser are you using
>> Can you give a try to change it and use the system browser (to change click 
>> on the right icon on the window ... Choose new default menu)
>> 
>> Can you change the theme?
>> using the preference pane?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>>> 
>>> Neil Butterworth
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to