I would kill it, unless you or somebody else really cares and is willing to spend time and energy on it. Otherwise you waste your time and accumulate garbage you cleaned here somewhere else.
Lukas On Sunday, November 29, 2009, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/11/29 Simon Denier <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > > > Hi there > > > I think this has been discussed before, but I cant tell if there is an > official rule for that (maybe it could be added to the wiki). > > > So let's say I have a patch which removes the Collection arithmetic protocols > (332 <http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=332>). Now this > protocol is still quite nice and we can offer it as an extension package for > those who need it. Where should I put this Collection-Arithmetic package? In > its own squeaksource project? > > > I would that. Create a new MC package called Collection-Arithmetic on > SqueakSource and I would not put it in Pharo Core or even in Pharo. However, > it is accessible and loadable for those who want that external package. > > Cheers, > > Mariano > > > > Or is there a project for extra packages for Pharo? > > -- > Simon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
