On 30 nov. 2009, at 09:45, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:07 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >>> Hi there >>> >>> I think this has been discussed before, but I cant tell if there is >>> an official rule for that (maybe it could be added to the wiki). >>> >>> So let's say I have a patch which removes the Collection arithmetic >>> protocols (332). Now this protocol is still quite nice and we can >>> offer it as an extension package for those who need it. Where >>> should I put this Collection-Arithmetic package? In its own >>> squeaksource project? Or is there a project for extra packages for >>> Pharo? >> >> in general if a package should be part of a dev image and it was >> curved out from the image it would >> be good to have in the Pharo repository. May be in the future we >> will need some repository for non core packages. > > I wouldn't put these packages into the SqueakSource project "Pharo". I > put the Sound and MorphicExample code that I removed from the core > into separate SqueakSource projects. Like this the main repository > does not get cluttered with unloaded code. Being separate from the > core code also allows for public write access, which is not granted on > the Pharo project.
OK, I will do that then. -- Simon _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
