2010/1/15 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: > ok I imagine that this is this change. >
Yes, comments are such good things ! You shall prefer to have a proceedable exception in pharo and keep an explicit message... > Name: Monticello-nice.342 > Author: nice > Time: 27 December 2009, 9:03:54 am > UUID: ead29222-29d3-421a-8d89-08d667014c1c > Ancestors: Monticello-bf.341 > > change #findSnapshotWithVersionInfo: to silently ignore a missing ancestor > rather than sending #snapshot to nil. > This happens for example when merging Pharo/CollectionTests. > Don't know if this is the good strategy though (maybe a notification could be > signalled) > > + Cosmetic: move or remove a few temps inside closures > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
