My question was also sent to torsten or other. What is the point? and I gave one possible interpretation of future.
Stef On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:25 AM, John M McIntosh wrote: > Stef at this point I'm going to poke it with a stick and see if it lives. > > Then we can dream, or at least I'll see about your dreaming. > > On 2010-01-26, at 12:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Two questions: >> >> but what will be the point to have Ginsu? >> We have the smalltalk metamodel + MC + PseudoClass and do we want one >> more? >> I know well Ginsu I have it on my harddisc and read it when MC was not >> even created and I wrote FAMIX which is a Ginsu for JavaC++Smalltalk. >> >> >> For me I dream about the following: >> >> - having ONE code metamodel (ginsu or MC) that can be used to do version >> management = MC versioning >> but has the same static interface than the Smalltalk runtime so that he can >> be browsed using the SAME code browser. > > -- > =========================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <[email protected]> Twitter: squeaker68882 > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com > =========================================================================== > > > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
