On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > I think, if you really want to compare, you should look closer than what the > two slogans say. Just one example: bugs.squeak.org currently has 2315 open > issues...
Does that number apply for the current squeak developement? Or did you just look at the number on the "view_all_bug_page" with no filter applied (which counts all the issues of other forks, external packages, non-developement related tasks, old branches, etc.) and thought: hey here's a big number, this will show how professional we are compared to squeak? Levente > > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Jan 27, 2010, at 17:39 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>>>> "Adrian" == Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Adrian> "Pharo provides a clean and innovative MIT-licensed Smalltalk >> Adrian> environment with a stable and small core system, excellent developer >> Adrian> tools, and maintained releases." >> >> Which, at this point, would not distinguish it from what Squeak core >> will be within another few weeks. >> >> Do you have any verbage that would allow newcomers to choose Squeak >> vs Pharo? >> >> Or are the goals and purpose finally merging again? >> >> -- >> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 >> <[email protected]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> >> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. >> See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
