> #sort you mean? Not yet... we either need to add it in Pharo, fix it > in the one click, or add it to the Grease package.
OrderedCollection>>#sort and OrderedCollection>>#sort: is already part of Pharo 1.1. The Seaside tests pass in Pharo 1.1. I understand and I agree with Pharo not to implement #sort and #sort: in SequenceableCollection, because it does not make sense for most subclasses. SortedCollection, Heap and Interval are already sorted; and for LinkedList sorting does not really make sense. So I don't really know what to do to fix the Seaside test. We could ask the Pharo guys to integrate OrderedCollection>>#sort and OrderedCollection>>#sort: into Pharo 1.0, but maybe that's already too late? Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
