On Feb 17, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
>> #sort you mean? Not yet... we either need to add it in Pharo, fix it
>> in the one click, or add it to the Grease package.
>
> OrderedCollection>>#sort and OrderedCollection>>#sort: is already part
> of Pharo 1.1. The Seaside tests pass in Pharo 1.1.
>
> I understand and I agree with Pharo not to implement #sort and #sort:
> in SequenceableCollection, because it does not make sense for most
> subclasses. SortedCollection, Heap and Interval are already sorted;
> and for LinkedList sorting does not really make sense.
>
> So I don't really know what to do to fix the Seaside test. We could
> ask the Pharo guys to integrate OrderedCollection>>#sort and
> OrderedCollection>>#sort: into Pharo 1.0, but maybe that's already too
> late?
>
I think we can add that 1.0
For 1.1, there are some changes for generalizing and cleaning sort on the
bugtracker that I plan to look
at (at some point).
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
