2010/2/27 Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>

>  Just checking :)
>
> In that case however, I would like to see a nice(r) way to construct
> Polymorph interfaces.  Dolphin's MVP framework is very powerful.  One thing
> that it does not seem to do well is allow domain objects to insert
> themselves into a GUI; Seaside and Magritte have an advantage there.  I find
> Magritte a little too helpful, and #description *much* too helpful, meaning
> that it does so much for me that I forget how things work.
>
> There is probably nothing to stop us from taking a little more control over
> Magritte descriptions and containers, and IIRC, there is a Polymorph version
> of Magritte (or is that just wishful thinking??).  Rather than write HTML to
> feed into what we all agree is a sub-optimal browser, I suggest putting the
> energy into refining Smalltalk idioms to turn data into a GUI using
> Polymorph.  The end result should be better user interfaces all around.
>
> Bill
>
>



I agree with these comments (don't know if the way to go is Polymorph being
that I don't know it deeper) but as I also think that Magritte is a BIG help
to write almost any sort of applications.

I we could have a better (more productive) way of write desktop UIs then we
can take over the win-linux.mac market :) I would try myself with my
PasswordsPro application (currently in Dolphin). It would be nice to me port
PasswordsPro to Pharo and sell it as a real desktop app (native in any
operating system) and reuse the same model to have it on web also.

Having a only one model, with UI in desktop and web will be really awesome,
even when a lot of people may claim that is possible today, I'm not really
convinced with complex applications.

Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to