> The paper talks about using stack pointer and program counter as > identifiers, I doubt stack depth as returned by such a method will > provide a good enough granularity to do proper disambiguation. > (not to mention the main reason for using them is that they can be > gotten with virtually no overhead...)
Not only the stack depth. But the function identity is given by the compiled method reference. Associating the stack depth with the compiled method will do the job apparently. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
