On 03.03.2010 22:21, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> The paper talks about using stack pointer and program counter as >> identifiers, I doubt stack depth as returned by such a method will >> provide a good enough granularity to do proper disambiguation. >> (not to mention the main reason for using them is that they can be >> gotten with virtually no overhead...) > Not only the stack depth. But the function identity is given by the > compiled method reference. > Associating the stack depth with the compiled method will do the job > apparently. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > Read a little past the abstract, and you'll understand what I was trying to tell you.
Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
