> > I see that the installScript uses ConfigurationOfMetacello from > gemsource metacello repository instead of Metacello repository. Given > that this will be the final release of 1.0, shouldn't we copy > ConfigurationOfMetacello to squeaksource/MetacelloRepository so that the > package registered in monticello is this instead of the gemstone one. > This repo for ConfigurationOfMetacello overrides the one of PharoCore > that points to squeaksource. > > Dale, can you put this version in squeaksource. The release is very > close and anyway it will be shipped in Pharo dev 1.0, so will reach a > lot of people, even if not on squeaksource > > Yes. This is because I added the ImageForDevelopers in the group. With that, when running headless I have the problem with the progress Bar. Then, i needed to use the silntly method, which is in Metacello beta.25 which is not released yet. That's why I have to put the other one.
Don't worry that beta.25 will be then correctly uploaded and released. After that, the installScript will be even simpler as I won't need to install Metacello manually, but with the ensureMetacello ;) Cheers Mariano > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users > > -- > Miguel Cobá > http://miguel.leugim.com.mx > >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
