Sorry. Want I wanted to ask is...for next Pharo releases, I do the same but
making clear O2 is not by default ?  or I just don't say anything about O2
in the release ?

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>wrote:

> I do not have a definite answer. I personally prefer O2 instead of OB. OB
> is more stable though, which is a big advantage.
> Maybe a pool will help the community to say its word on it? Whether it
> wants to see O2 included or not in Pharo 1.0. Like this, you will not have
> to make an arbitrary decision. just an idea.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
>
> On 24 Mar 2010, at 08:49, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> Hi Mariano,
>>
>> I wonder why you mentioned O2 issues below because O2 is not in Pharo
>> anymore, isn't it?
>>
>>
>> Sorry Adrian. I forgot about this email. I answer to the mail as it has an
>> excellent question and my bad :)
>>
>> I put the O2 issues because:
>>
>> - I think it is a "official package that works on Pharo" even if we don't
>> know what a official package is.
>> - I have to create a version of the metacello configuration for O2 and I
>> wanted to put the issues in the "description" of the release
>> - The O2 issues were submitted in Pharo issue tracking, thus, I wanted to
>> put them as closed and put "integrated in PharoXXX"
>> - I changed the welcome workspace to load this new version of O2
>>
>> However, it doesn't mean that O2 is now included in Dev images. Now you
>> made me realize that this can be confusing. So, what should I do ? I am all
>> ears :)
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2010, at 20:40 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks. We are proud to announce the (hopefully) last RC3 for Pharo
>> 1.0.
>> >
>> > This image is based in PharoCore-1.0-10515rc3. The image also contain
>> lot of
>> > fixes and improvements of external packages:
>> >
>> > These, are the fixed issues of the external tools:
>> >
>> > OB:  Issues 1891, 1748, 1670, 1667, 1705, 1667
>> >
>> > O2: issues 1887, 1312, 1429, 1886, 2073
>> >
>> > New Inspector:  issues 1783, 1499
>> >
>> > Refactoring Browser:  issue 2108
>> >
>> > The link is:
>> >
>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26680/Pharo-1.0-10515-rc3dev10.03.1.zip
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Mariano
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pharo-project mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to