On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I do on my build server is to unload the tests:
>
> (MCWorkingCopy allManagers
> inject: Gofer new
> into: [ :gofer :each |
> ((each packageName endsWith: 'Test') or: [ each
> packageName endsWith: 'Tests' ])
> ifTrue: [ gofer package: each packageName ].
> gofer ])
> unload.
>
>
ScriptLoader >> cleanUpForProduction do that but similary:
#(#Tests #CollectionsTests #CompilerTests #FreeTypeTests #GraphicsTests
#KernelTests #MorphicTests #MultilingualTests #NetworkTests #ToolsTest)
do: [ :each | (MCPackage named: each) unload ]. "unload SUnit"
Smalltalk globals
at: #TestCase
ifPresent: [ :class | SystemChangeNotifier uniqueInstance
noMoreNotificationsFor: class ].
#(#SUnitGUI #SUnit) do: [ :each | (MCPackage named: each) unload ].
Maybe we you should change it ?
> > Hi folks. I was playing a bit trying to shrink a little a PharoCore
> image.
> > My idea was to think a shrink that was be acceptable for the most common
> > scenario: a runtime (production) environment where. Of course, some of
> the
> > things I do in the shrinks has side effects, but most of the times, you
> can
> > deal with that in such scenarios.
>
> Shouldn't most of the code you publish be part of the <cleanup> protocol?
>
>
You refere to the "new" cleanUp protocol ?
The thing is that not everything is a cleanUp, but a shrink. Suppose the
code that zap all the organizations...that's not a cleanUp.
So, maybe yes, but not all of them.
Cheers
Mariano
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
