On 24 mars 2010, at 15:03, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I do not have a definite answer. I personally prefer O2 instead of OB. OB is > more stable though, which is a big advantage. > Maybe a pool will help the community to say its word on it? Whether it wants > to see O2 included or not in Pharo 1.0. Like this, you will not have to make > an arbitrary decision. just an idea.
I recently came back to O2 and it's a huge relief in usability. However as Alex puts it, OB is more stable (for example in O2, I just noticed that I dont have anymore the completion in the mercury bar). In favor of pushing 1.0 release, I am for keeping OB because it is stable. However, I remember that it also impacts the book pharo by example, which has to use only one browser. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > > > On 24 Mar 2010, at 08:49, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Mariano, >> >> I wonder why you mentioned O2 issues below because O2 is not in Pharo >> anymore, isn't it? >> >> >> Sorry Adrian. I forgot about this email. I answer to the mail as it has an >> excellent question and my bad :) >> >> I put the O2 issues because: >> >> - I think it is a "official package that works on Pharo" even if we don't >> know what a official package is. >> - I have to create a version of the metacello configuration for O2 and I >> wanted to put the issues in the "description" of the release >> - The O2 issues were submitted in Pharo issue tracking, thus, I wanted to >> put them as closed and put "integrated in PharoXXX" >> - I changed the welcome workspace to load this new version of O2 >> >> However, it doesn't mean that O2 is now included in Dev images. Now you made >> me realize that this can be confusing. So, what should I do ? I am all ears >> :) >> >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> On Mar 20, 2010, at 20:40 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >> > Hi folks. We are proud to announce the (hopefully) last RC3 for Pharo 1.0. >> > >> > This image is based in PharoCore-1.0-10515rc3. The image also contain lot >> > of >> > fixes and improvements of external packages: >> > >> > These, are the fixed issues of the external tools: >> > >> > OB: Issues 1891, 1748, 1670, 1667, 1705, 1667 >> > >> > O2: issues 1887, 1312, 1429, 1886, 2073 >> > >> > New Inspector: issues 1783, 1499 >> > >> > Refactoring Browser: issue 2108 >> > >> > The link is: >> > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26680/Pharo-1.0-10515-rc3dev10.03.1.zip >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Mariano >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pharo-project mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Simon _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
