On 2010-03-29, at 12:29 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> Yes! The windows VM has already that. The MacVM, I sent an email few months 
> ago to explain how to do it.
> If you want, I can upload a Squeak 4.2.2beta1U.app   but with the Pharo icons 
> and named Pharo 4.2.2beta1U.app
> Then we link from the website to that VM. What do you think ? 
> 
> I know there are newer MacOS VMs, but they are still in beta and for the 
> Pharo 1.0 I think the best VM is the 4.2.2.beta1
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mariano 

That would be a 4.2.3b1  VM since it contains the bitblt fixes that the Squeak 
folks wanted. I have no 
idea how that impacts text rendering on Pharo.  

Also this week I will ship a 4.2.4b1 VM which is the result of some Squeak 4.0 
base VM merge processing and contains the fix to enable the loading of old 
image segments used I guess by squeakmap?

Frankly in all of this perhaps we should consider the use of the Version 5. 0 
macintosh cocoa VM running in 32bit mode? 

--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to