On Mar 31, 2010, at 9:25 AM, John M McIntosh wrote:
> Well 5.0 is still in Alpha.
> Feedback is slow, so the issue is how to drive acceptance?
>
I suggest to release 1.0 with the altest 4er Mac VM, than advacate 5.0 for 1.1.
Marcus
> The problem with the 64bit VM with 32bit images is that all the plugins
> have to be recompiled. Mind I did do the FreeType one.
> However I was thinking that we could run the 5.0 VM in 32bit mode and use the
> existing plugins to minimize impact.
>
> On 2010-03-30, at 11:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> John
>>
>> it is really important that 1.0 is working very well so we can start pushing
>> 5.0 for 1.1.
>> Now
>> who is using 5.0 ?
>> what are the problem left? I got some glitches like not been able to
>> open two images but this was
>> at the beginning. Now I thought that 5.0 was not officially out.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:47 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:
>>
>>> Frankly in all of this perhaps we should consider the use of the Version 5.
>>> 0 macintosh cocoa VM running in 32bit mode?
>>
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <[email protected]> Twitter: squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> ===========================================================================
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
