jarober says: >The reason these "Smalltalk for .NET" and "Smalltalk for the JVM" >projects never seem to come off is simple - Smalltalk isn't just flat >text in an editor. Smalltalk is the entire interactive environment. >It would be fairly simple to get a syntax parser, but it wouldn't be >Smalltalk. It would be Ruby or Python with Smalltalk syntax. >Somewhat useful perhaps, but not really Smalltalk.
:( Hopefully it would have sufficient knowledge to be able to do something thus. Sorry, but I believe that it is the way that had to take commercial Smalltalk. It surprises to me that Cincom and company do not see it. Regards. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/A-port-of-Pharo-Redline-Smalltalk-tp1751884p1751963.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
