I'd like to contribute, but I am not good enough for the difficult
ones to come to pleasing solutions, and I somehow don't feel the other
ones accessable for me :/

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi richard
>
> some changes are changes coming from squeak and in such a case there is the 
> squeak change
> It does not mean that we can integrate the change as it is.
> Thanks for looking at fixes and bug entries
>
> Stef
>
> On Apr 10, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Richard Durr wrote:
>
>> I am still trying to grok how this issue-fixing works. For example, in
>> "Difficulty:Easy" there are some issues which consist mostly of
>> ChangeSets of something. O_o
>
> O_o
>
> Nice :)
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Yes this is the vision we have.
>>> Now if people would help for simple things in pharo we would have more time 
>>> for such issues.
>>> We got several people doing PhD on modules and related. We studied 
>>> namespace and other kind of
>>> points so we have an idea of what could be a solution but it should be 
>>> implemented
>>> tested.....
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Richard Durr wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, it's not. I would be far more valuable to have modularized images
>>>> though: Just like Next/Apples Nibs or Bundle-mechanism. These
>>>> image-modules would be edited from a development-image-bundle. They
>>>> could be used to form stand-alone applications already clean of the
>>>> development code or libraries that contain only a diff to the base
>>>> classes, these library-images could then be combined to form more
>>>> complex images. They could also contain their own namespace… and they
>>>> would replace the non-modelling packaging mechanism, but I digress… ^^
>>>>
>>>> | packageWorkedOn |
>>>> packageWorkedOn := Browser newPackageNamed: 'Calculator'.
>>>> packageWorkedOn importPackage: 'Seaside'.
>>>> "Create code in the Browser…"
>>>> packageWorkedOn saveAsMonticello.
>>>> packageWordedOn saveAsPackage.
>>>> packageWorkedOn saveAsApplication.
>>>>
>>>> or something like that … ^^
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:08 PM, nullPointer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> jarober says:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason these "Smalltalk for .NET" and "Smalltalk for the JVM"
>>>>>> projects never seem to come off is simple - Smalltalk isn't just flat
>>>>>> text in an editor.  Smalltalk is the entire interactive environment.
>>>>>> It would be fairly simple to get a syntax parser, but it wouldn't be
>>>>>> Smalltalk.  It would be Ruby or Python with Smalltalk syntax.
>>>>>> Somewhat useful perhaps, but not really Smalltalk.
>>>>>
>>>>> :(
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully it would have sufficient knowledge to be able to do something
>>>>> thus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but I believe that it is the way that had to take commercial
>>>>> Smalltalk. It surprises to me that Cincom and company do not see it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context: 
>>>>> http://n4.nabble.com/A-port-of-Pharo-Redline-Smalltalk-tp1751884p1751963.html
>>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to