On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:26 03PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Hi guys
> 
> mariano, marcus and adrian got some push to get 1.0 out. I was just on cc:
> I think that we made a mistake not to roll that publicly via the mailing-list 
> (we will do that for 1.1).
> Now this is holidays time here, mariano is going to get married and adrian 
> just moved so no
> internet connection.
> Tomorrow I will sync with marcus to know if I can help to get this 1.0 
> version out.
> If I remember the mails I saw, marcus was looking for the 
>       BitBltPluging binaries for the one click image on other platforms than 
> mac os.
> 
> Stef
Hum, aren't they usually built as internal?
In that case, the only reason for including plugin binaries would be if there's 
been bug fixes to it since the vm was shipped... 
Which would probably mean you're providing a too old VM in the first place.
IIRC, On Windows, 3.11.8 / 4.0.2 would both include updated plugins, the main 
difference being 4.0.2 providing support for old image segment loading, but 
requiring in-image handling of quit events.

Not sure about linux, since I don't use it.
Seems to be in a state of updating at the moment, with 5-6 commits over the 
weekend, so might be worth waiting for.

Cheers,
Henry
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to