Hi, with last squeak-vm Linux binaries all Pharo tests are green and fonts working. So it may be a good candidate for the one click image.
http://www.squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.3.2202-linux_i386.tar.gz Cheers, Laurent Laffont On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Henrik Johansen < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:26 03PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > Hi guys > > > > mariano, marcus and adrian got some push to get 1.0 out. I was just on > cc: > > I think that we made a mistake not to roll that publicly via the > mailing-list (we will do that for 1.1). > > Now this is holidays time here, mariano is going to get married and > adrian just moved so no > > internet connection. > > Tomorrow I will sync with marcus to know if I can help to get this 1.0 > version out. > > If I remember the mails I saw, marcus was looking for the > > BitBltPluging binaries for the one click image on other platforms > than mac os. > > > > Stef > Hum, aren't they usually built as internal? > In that case, the only reason for including plugin binaries would be if > there's been bug fixes to it since the vm was shipped... > Which would probably mean you're providing a too old VM in the first place. > IIRC, On Windows, 3.11.8 / 4.0.2 would both include updated plugins, the > main difference being 4.0.2 providing support for old image segment loading, > but requiring in-image handling of quit events. > > Not sure about linux, since I don't use it. > Seems to be in a state of updating at the moment, with 5-6 commits over the > weekend, so might be worth waiting for. > > Cheers, > Henry > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
