You may be right. Now I suggest that we do and learn. Stef
On May 17, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Mariano Martinez Peck wrote on [1]: >> I don't agree here. You DON'T necessary need to have the packages inside the >> image to have a UI. > > Please read what I wrote. I did not say that it is impossible > to build the UI when you have an external config - but "it would > be easy to build a UI" when it is already in the image. I'm sure > you will agree here. > > However - even when SqueakMap is not well maintained - it's UI > was easy to use and was easy accessible and one could use it > with a few clicks. > > Using Monticello tools, loading and evaluating by hand is > currently possible - but this is a step backward in usability > compared to what Squeak has/had. But this is a convenience/tool > issue that has to be solved. > > Bye > T. > > [1] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-May/026829.html > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
