Hi goran and stephan
It is difficult to follow if we should take action. Apparently we do not have
all the story.
so if we should something please tell us.
Now 1.1 got so much improvements may be it worth to have a look at it.
You can find a direct link on 1.1 from
http://www.pharo-project.org/home
Stef
> Hi!
>
> CCing Pharo list, this was regarding:
>
> http://goran.krampe.se/blog/Squeak/eblankett-dev.rdoc
>
> On 05/30/2010 12:00 PM, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>> Hello Göran,
>>
>> Is there a special reason you tried Pharo 1.0? Your improvements are of
>
> Nope, just (wrongly I agree) thought it was fairly up to date since it was
> just released. But you are right, depending on release process that does
> indeed not necessarily correlate.
>
>> course
>> in 1.1. Feature freeze for 1.0 was long ago. If you're willing to use
>> the bleeding edge
>> in squeak, why not do it in pharo too?
>
> Again, not a conscious choice. I can use bleeding edge in Pharo too, is there
> an easy place to start? Earlier I used some core + Renggli scripts to get a
> decent image.
>
>> Which peek bugfix is in Squeak? The 2010-1-13 solution is wrong.
>> See http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1813.
>
> I will check it out, gotta work on the house now :)
>
>> Groetjes,
>> Stephan Eggermont
>
> Thanks for the feedback, Göran
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
