I expected that but what's the reason behind that change? The entry is http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2136 2010/6/7 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
> > On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Germán Leiva wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a doubt ... > > > > why in Pharo 1.0 > > > > Smalltalk class == SystemDictionary > > > > and in Pharo 1.1 > > > > Smalltalk class == SmalltalkImage? > > Yes this is normal > > now Smalltalk globals class == SystemDictionary > > > Looking at the issue tracker (thanks Carla): > > We should make > > > > - Smalltalk pointing to SmalltalkImage current > > - have SystemDictionary only having classbindings management. > > and Smalltalk globals pointing to SystemDictionary instance. > > this is done. > which entry is that? > > > > This way we finish the refactoring started long time ago. > > We should have a look at the way this was done in Squeak so that we get > the same > > compatible for now solution. > > > > What's involved in the refactoring started long time ago and what's the > motivation for it? > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Germán Leiva > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Germán Leiva [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
